INFORMS Journal on Computing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


INFORMS JOURNAL ON COMPUTING
Vol. 18, No. 3, Summer 2006, pp. 348-365
DOI: 10.1287/ijoc.1040.0123
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gamvros, I.
Right arrow Articles by Raghavan, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

The Multilevel Capacitated Minimum Spanning Tree Problem

Ioannis Gamvros, Bruce Golden, S. Raghavan

The Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742-1815, USA
The Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742-1815, USA
The Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742-1815, USA

igamvros{at}rhsmith.umd.edu
bgolden{at}rhsmith.umd.edu
raghavan{at}umd.edu

In this paper, we consider the multilevel capacitated minimum spanning tree (MLCMST) problem, a generalization of the well-known capacitated minimum spanning tree (CMST) problem, that allows for multiple facility types in the design of the network. We develop two flow-based mixed integer programming formulations that can be used to find tight lower bounds for MLCMST problems with up to 150 nodes. We also develop several heuristic procedures for the MLCMST problem. First, we present a savings-based heuristic. Next, we develop local search algorithms that use exponential size, node-based, cyclic and path exchange neighborhoods. Finally, we develop a hybrid genetic algorithm for the MLCMST. Extensive computational results on a large set of test problems indicate that the genetic algorithm is robust and, among the heuristics, generates the best solutions. They are typically 6.09% from the lower bound and 0.25% from the optimal solution value.

Key words: networks; tree algorithms; heuristics; local search; multiexchange neighborhood; genetic algorithms
History: received June 2003; revised October 2004; accepted November 2004.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by INFORMS.