INFORMS Journal on Computing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


INFORMS JOURNAL ON COMPUTING
Vol. 19, No. 2, Spring 2007, pp. 175-184
DOI: 10.1287/ijoc.1060.0191
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Royset, J. O.
Right arrow Articles by Wood, R. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Solving the Bi-Objective Maximum-Flow Network-Interdiction Problem

Johannes O. Royset, R. Kevin Wood

Operations Research Department, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California 93943, USA
Operations Research Department, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California 93943, USA

joroyset{at}nps.edu
kwood{at}nps.edu

We describe a new algorithm for computing the efficient frontier of the "bi-objective maximum-flow network-interdiction problem." In this problem, an "interdictor" seeks to interdict (destroy) a set of arcs in a capacitated network that are Pareto-optimal with respect to two objectives, minimizing total interdiction cost and minimizing maximum flow. The algorithm identifies these solutions through a sequence of single-objective problems solved using Lagrangian relaxation and a specialized branch-and-bound algorithm. The Lagrangian problems are simply max-flow min-cut problems, while the branch-and-bound procedure partially enumerates s-t cuts. Computational tests reveal the new algorithm to be one to two orders of magnitude faster than an algorithm that replaces the specialized branch-and-bound algorithm with a standard integer-programming solver.

Key words: interdiction; maximum flow; Lagrangian relaxation; cut enumeration
History: received September 2005; revised March 2006; accepted May 2006.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by INFORMS.